One thing
that political strategists believe is that their candidate must stay on
message, so they pick a specific message and then drive that point home,
unfortunately, things are changing a bit and this tactic seems to be backfiring
a bit. You see, the newest generation is a click happy, nano-second group of
folks and they are planning on voting this time around.
Thus, if
political campaigns keep playing the same old boring TV advertisements over and
over again they are going to get bored and irritated. They want substance,
variety and interesting fun commercials. This creates a huge problem because
the political campaigns know that older voters vote 2:1 over younger voters and
so the campaigns need to do what works for targeting baby-boomers without
turning off the millennials.
Remember,
even though the millennials spend more time online than watching TV, they still
watch TV some and so, if all they see is re-runs they are going to assign those
candidates to "more of the same" or just more of the "status
quo" and they typically do not trust government or the status quo much.
See the dilemma?
Obviously,
the TV ads for political campaigns borrow from corporate advertising branding
techniques and anything that has worked well in the past. But while doing this
they also are seen running a familiar strategy, one that is often reviled by
this next generation. Simple messages for the masses is the name of the game in
political advertising or so it has been.
But, at the
same time that the mass media strategy tries to drive home that message,
hopefully one that everyone can agree upon for the sake of the candidate, the
targeted marketing using email lists, instant messaging, direct mail and actual
door to door meet and greeters; and this poses a slight conflict. A dilemma
that the millennials are starting to question, as the massive repetition of the
exact same TV ad over and over again are starting to make them angry. Think on
this.
Comments
Post a Comment