Are you running
for election? Congratulations to you on your initiative.
As a
candidate for political office you need to do your homework and prepare. Learn
the issues, take a position and build a network. One more thing - learn how to
present your message well. And do it better than the competition.
The mayoral
candidates spoke at a community meeting. Four of the five candidates attended.
They were each allowed an opening and closing statement. In between they were
asked to answer several written questions from the audience. The candidates
were allowed up to 90 seconds for each answer.
As a
professional speaker and executive speech coach I was under impressed by the
candidates. But I was not surprised by the lack of presentation prowess. It
would be so easy for political candidates to improve their presentations
skills. Why do they neglect such a powerful tool of persuasion and success?
Let's be
clear. The purpose of these community meetings is to demonstrate that the
candidates understand the key issues of the audience and that they can do
something about it.
Here are my
presentation tips for these mayoral candidates in particular and all political
hopefuls in general.
Learn How to
Use Microphones
The first
speaker tested his microphone by blowing on it before he spoke. That is both
annoying and unprofessional. The best way to test a microphone is to speak.
Don't say "TEST, TEST" or "Is this thing on?" Just speak
normally.
First be
Human
Only one
speaker (the incumbent) thanked the organizers and complimented the other
candidates in the room. That's a sign of experience, confidence and compassion.
Talk to the
Audience, Not your Notes
One speaker
seemed to read everything he said - his opening and closing and even the
answers to questions. In between he was busily scribbling notes while the other
speakers spoke. He clearly was not in the room. He might be a good back room
researcher and thinker but not a leader.
Don't Look
Angry
One
candidate displayed his anger a few times. He also complained that current
council had been divisive. He promised to correct that by forcing them to be
more efficient. How? By getting angry at them?
Focus on
What's Relevant
This same
angry candidate included a rant about federal politics - on a totally unrelated
issue. He went so far as to encourage the audience to contact a local MP about
his pet federal issue. What does that have to do with this municipal election?
Do you want to be mayor or do you just want to rant?
Conclude
Ninety
seconds might sound like a short time to speak but successful politicians need
to speak in sound bytes which can be 5 to 30 seconds. For this program they
received signals from the timer at 60, 30 and 10 seconds - yet they missed the
opportunity to conclude. Most of the time the speakers trailed off and
sometimes they ended so meekly that we wondered if they were done speaking.
Conclude every mini speech and end strong.
Smile
A smile
indicates confidence, warmth and trust. Why didn't these candidates smile more?
Every mini speech should have ended with a smile and steady gaze at the
audience. Instead they frowned, looked down and glanced sideways at the MC. No
one looked happy with their message. The sound in the room was bad. Just
imagine that no one understood the words spoken and saw only the speaker. If
you looked up at the speaker at the end of their mini speech you would have
felt like it was another disappointing answer.
Make me
Laugh
The surest
way to connect with anyone is to make them laugh. So why didn't you make us
laugh? There were a couple of weak attempts from two of the candidates during
the 90-minute torture session. We don't expect you to be Seinfeld. However, a
chuckle goes a long way.
Repeat or
Reframe the Question
By the time
we heard from the third speaker the audience might have forgotten the original
question. Some questions were long and multipart and some of the speakers went
off on tangents. Repeating or reframing the question will remind the audience
of the question and help you stay on track.
Be Prepared
Some of the
candidates seemed to be winging it at times. It looked as if they had never
thought about or considered the questions before. Yet, none of the questions
were surprises.
Yes, I know
that substance counts as well as style. But when there seems to be little
difference in substance we gravitate to style. Unfortunately we don't ask our
political candidates to write an exam. So we need to judge them on style
because that's all we can see.
Comments
Post a Comment